Grading

Grading of Student Achievement:

Standard (A+AA-…F)

Grading is based on performance in assessment tasks/activities

Production Plan and Reflection

Letter Grade Grade Point Grade Definitions Description
A+ A A- 4.3

4.0

3.7

Excellent
  • Excellent grasp of materials, ability to explain key concepts, assumptions, and debates, demonstrating sound knowledge of the field
  • Rich content, exceptional ability to integrate various resources into primary and secondary levels based on demand;
  • Design and conduct research which is firmly built on thorough knowledge of existing theoretical frameworks
  • Evaluative judgments about existing research and demonstrate application of strong critical thinking skills
  • organization and procedural clarity at the same time demonstrating the importance of the process
B+ B B- 3.3

3.0

2.7

Good
  • Firm grasp of materials, ability to explain key concepts and assumptions
  • Adequate content, strong ability to integrate various resources into primary and secondary levels based on demand;
  • Design and conduct research which is built on thorough knowledge of existing theoretical frameworks
  • Ability to approach a text or a theme using a variety of theories and analytical tools
C+ C C- 2.3

2.0

1.7

Adequate
  • Comprehensive grasp of materials, able to explain key concepts
  • Adequate content, fair ability to integrate various resources into primary and secondary levels based on demand
  • Appropriate judgments about existing research
  • Weak ability to approach a text or a theme using a variety of theories and analytical tools
D 1.0 Marginal
  • Loose grasp of materials, cannot explain key concepts
  • Weak content, with primary and secondary levels
  • Marginal judgments about existing research
  • Poor ability to approach a text or a theme using a variety of theories and analytical tools
F 0.0 Failure
  • Poor grasp of materials
  • Inadequate content, without primary and secondary levels
  • Fail to make reasonable judgments about existing research
  • Fail to approach a text or a theme using a variety of theories and analytical tools

 Shooting Report and Footage Presentation

Letter Grade Grade Point Grade Definitions Description
A+ A A- 4.3

4.0

3.7

Excellent
  • Rich content, excellent ability to interpret and integrate various resources
  • Well defined and reasoned points of view grounded in insightful interpretation of existing literature
  • Readiness to respond to peer opinion and other views initiated in class discussion
B+ B B- 3.3

3.0

2.7

Good
  • Adequate content, sufficient ability to integrate various resources based on demand
  • Clear elaboration of ideas that sticks to the point, with clearly differentiated issues, ability to interpret opinions independently
  • Sufficient responses to peer comments to sustain a discussion
C+ C C- 2.3

2.0

1.7

Adequate
  • Adequate content, fair ability to integrate various resources based on demand
  • Relevant points made to the subject matter in question
  • Ability to respond to other statements and engage in class discussion
D 1.0 Marginal
  • Weak content, limited use of resources
  • Relevant points to the subject matter, marginal ability to interpret opinions
  • Ability to respond to other comments in simple terms
F 0.0 Failure
  • Inadequate content, no/ irrelevant use of resources
  • Irrelevant points to the subject matter, no ability to interpret opinions
  • Fail to respond to other comments

 Treatment and Paper Editing

Letter Grade Grade Point Grade Definitions Description
A+ A A- 4.3

4.0

3.7

Excellent
  • Work has strong affective quality and the articulation of personal styles and signature
  • Work raises questions and instill insights about the process of conception, creative strategization and production
  • Efficient adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources
B+ B B- 3.3

3.0

2.7

Good
  • Work has articulation of personal styles and signature
  • Work shows important issues that requires exploration
  • Proper adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources
C+ C C- 2.3

2.0

1.7

Adequate
  • Work is relatively complete and comprehensible
  • Limited ability to demonstrate creative thinking or exploration
  • Fair adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources
D 1.0 Marginal
  • Work is not affective at all
  • Marginal ability demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration
  • Limited adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources
F 0.0 Failure
  • No appreciation of the aesthetics and expressive qualities of the medium
  • Fail to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration
  • No adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources

 Final Version Screening and Discussion

Letter Grade Grade Point Grade Definitions Description
A+ A A- 4.3

4.0

3.7

Excellent
  • Work has strong affective quality and the articulation of personal styles and signature
  • Work raises questions and instill insights about the process of conception, creative strategization and production
  • Excellent reception from viewers and peers
B+ B B- 3.3

3.0

2.7

Good
  • Strong exploration and/or application of the aesthetic and expressive qualities of the medium
  • Ability to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration
  • Good reception from viewers and peers
C+ C C- 2.3

2.0

1.7

Adequate
  • Basic appreciation and/or application of the aesthetic and expressive qualities of the medium
  • Limited ability to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration
  • Fair reception from viewers and peers
D 1.0 Marginal
  • Marginal appreciation of the aesthetic and expressive qualities of the medium
  • Marginal ability to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration
  • Poor reception from viewers and peers
F 0.0 Failure
  • No appreciation of the aesthetics and expressive qualities of the medium
  • Fail to create project/ work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration
  • Very poor reception from viewers and peers

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s